- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:37:57 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 17/10/11 19:57, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Thanks Andy for spotting this.
> Fixed in the editor's draft on CVS, see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml
>
> As for the stray '{' that actually was missing the closing '}' and meant to denote the Dataset-UNION over a set (of datasets).
> I added a clarifying remark for this slight abuse of notation now after the definition of Dataset-UNION:
>
> --------
> <p>Note that, in the following, when we write Dataset-UNION(<em>X</em> ) where<em>X</em> = {DS<sub>1</sub>,DS<sub>2</sub>,... ,DS<sub>n</sub>} is a set of datasets, we understand this as a shorthand for Dataset-UNION(DS<sub>1</sub>, Dataset-UNION(DS<sub>2</sub>( ... , Dataset-UNION(DS<sub>n</sub>),{}) ... ).
> </p>
> --------
4.2.4 Dataset
has a typesetting problem. 4th bullet.
4.3.1 Insert Data Operation
has another notation. Dataset-UNION(*GS*, ...)
Ditto 4.4.1 and other places
(yes, it's clear informally what it means, but ti's not what it says)
This could do with tidying up editorially:
4.1.1 says a Graph Store is
GS = {DG, (iri1, G1), ... , (irin, Gn) }
but it's not written like this later which is a bit confusing.
4.2.5 writes a dataset as:
DS={DG} union {(irii, Gi) | 1 ≤ i ≤ n}
(typo: "... } be and RDF Dataset")
4.3.5, 4.4.1, 4.4.2 write:
Let GS = {DG} union {(irii, Gi) | 1 ≤ i ≤ n} and graphNames(GS) = { irii
| 1 ≤ i ≤ n}
Using the same way helps the reader pick up the sameness. The
definition form in 4.1.1 is better.
Andy
>
> Axel
>
>
> On 14 Oct 2011, at 20:37, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> The definition in 4.2.5 Dataset( QuadPattern, P, DS, GS )
>>
>> uses:
>>
>> Dataset(QuadPattern, μ)
>>
>> but should be
>>
>> Dataset(QuadPattern, μ, DS, GS)
>>
>> and there is a stray {
>>
>> I think is should be:
>>
>> Dataset(QuadPattern, P, DS, GS ) =
>> Dataset-UNION( Dataset(QuadPattern, μ, DS, GS)
>> | μ in eval'(DS(DG),P) )
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 21:38:38 UTC