- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:35:17 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 29/09/11 08:51, Olivier Corby wrote: > On 09/29/2011 09:22 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> The xsd:double is presumable supposed to catch the case of a string in >> the data; there aren't any strings in the data. >> >> Olivier - was that the intention? > > The intention was to cover the blank node _:b2 > > Olivier Firstly - apologies - I messed up committing new files and then I had an appointment elsewhere. I've make the changes again. ------------------------------- @prefix : <http://example.com/data/#> . :x :p 1, "2", 3, 4 . :y :p 1, _:b2, 3, 4 . :z :p 2.5e0, "not a double" , 3.5, 4 . ------------------------------- This time I put a not-a-double in the data to test that code path. The checked in changes leave the group with _:b2 alone and add strings to the other groups so you intention is still covered, I think. Is that OK? Andy
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 10:35:47 UTC