- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:41:05 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Partial draft: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RC-4 We need to decide on the contents of the red box: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#grammar before this reply can be sent. Personally, I'm not in favor of changing the local part of prefix names as the case for it is based on RDF2RDB and alternatives such as not using the "=" character (e.g. use "_" instead) in generated identifiers have not been answered. I'm more in favor of SPARQL and Turtle being the same and the RDF-WG has not determined this yet and it is not under active discussion currently. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:41:46 UTC