- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:04:57 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Axel, The WG voted to publish a particular version of the document (the json-results-lc.html snapshot) so in theory that is the one that should be published. But the changes are merely editorial (I promise) and everything should be noted in the CVS log. So I don't mind which version is published - I slightly prefer the latest but this is a little bit non-process. Andy On 08/09/11 05:51, Axel Polleres wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I am looking into this at the moment, the minor editorial changes on the json-result format from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0215.html > already incorporated in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml shall go on board, I assume, yes?) > > cheers, > Axel > > On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:10, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> Any news on the publishing process? >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:05:41 UTC