- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:56:53 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
sounds ok to me. best, Axel On 21 Aug 2011, at 05:33, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > If there are no questions or comments, I'd like to propose on Tuesday > that we resolve this question as per the below email. > > So please let me know what you think! > > Lee > > On 8/15/2011 10:11 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > 1/ The parameters are called using-graph-uri and using-named-graph-uri > > > > 2/ If at least one value for one of the parameters is present, then the > > protocol parameters fully define the RDF dataset that is used for the > > query pattern matching (WHERE clause) of all operations in the update > > request. That is, they fully replace all USING and USING NAMED clauses > > in the request's operations. > > > > A third way of stating this: the semantics of including at least one of > > using-graph-uri and using-named-graph-uri is the equivalent of doing the > > following: > > > > A) Remove all USING clauses from the request. > > B) Remove all USING NAMED clauses from the request. > > C) For each using-graph-uri=u in the protocol request > > For each INSERT/DELETE/INSERT DELETE operation in the request > > Add "USING u" to the operation > > D) For each using-named-graph-uri=u in the protocol request > > For each INSERT/DELETE/INSERT DELETE operation in the request > > Add "USING NAMED u" to the operation > > > > > > Protocol says nothing further about the semantics of these parameters -- > > everything else is based on the semantics already given for USING and > > USING NAMED in SPARQL 1.1 Update. This includes things like whether > > "USING x" mentioned repeatedly in an update request refers to a mutable > > graph or a graph as retrieved from the Web; this includes things like > > the interaction between these parameters and WITH. > > > > Our options at this point: > > > > + Discuss any questions > > + Consider any alternative proposals > > + Consider dropping these parameters altogether > > + Consider adopting this proposal > > > > Lee > >
Received on Sunday, 21 August 2011 10:57:33 UTC