- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:18:33 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:07 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
>
> On 9 Aug 2011, at 17:23, Gregory Williams wrote:
>
>> I'm mostly happy with the 01 and 02 tests. csv03 still has a c14n problem ("1"^^xsd:decimal). Can we change that like with did with "5.5"?
>
> Well, I deliberately isolated that in a separate test case collecting more "corner cases" than in 01 and 02 , but I still think we shouldn't throw it away, should we? It is a valid test case in the end, isn't it?
I'm not sure if it's "valid". If I've understood what's going on, it seems to me that it's testing something that's entirely outside the scope of SPARQL, and so definitely shouldn't be a required test. Marking it with an mf:requires is one possibility, but I'm not sure we've had a negative requirement before. ":csvtsvXX mf:requires :NoC14N" seems really strange to me.
.greg
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 16:19:29 UTC