- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:08:33 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In SPARQL 1.0, conformance to the SPARQL Protocol required that an implementation implement the abstract query interface, and that if the implementation implemented the HTTP or SOAP bindings to that interface, that that be done in the manner specified in the document. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/#conformance) In the SPARQL 1.1 Protocol, we have these changes: * Added an update operation * Removed an abstract definition of the operation * Removed SOAP bindings * Added the ability to directly POST a query or update, in addition to via HTTP GET & POST So what should conformance be? Suggestion: * Implement either the query or the update operation or both * For any implemented operations, implement it in at least one of the ways normatively defined in the document This feels to me to be in the spirit of the SPARQL 1.0 Protocol... that said, I'm not thrilled with it since this is a protocol and this gives you 5 different things you can implement to be a conformant SPARQL 1.1 Protocol implementation -- that doesn't seem great to be for interoperability. What do you think? Lee
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 02:09:17 UTC