- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:47:58 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 25/07/11 12:35, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been working in dividing the Fed extension semantics section in > two, one for SERVICE and another one for SERVICE VAR. I just added new > semantics definition for SERVICE VAR, but now, in that part I do not > know how to specify that when doing SERVICE ?X, ?X may be still not > bounded and a query to all possible values may happen. Any idea? Section 2.3 talks about SERVICE ?var as an optional feature and the document has quite a lot of machinary that drfines it (boundedness condition, evaluation semantics, strongly bounded variable, service safeness). I'd like to suggest a different approach which is to describe it (sec 2.3 - and it's would be marked "Informative"), provide some guidance text as to what it might do, and then not mention it in the definition section. The guidance text would include some conditions but done in language and not be exhaustive. Put this section after the formal definition (currently sec 3), before "conformance". Section 4 (Grammar) can be removed as it is in the query doc already (I thought we'd already decided to do that). This section could include the structure that it's a loop over the possible values of the variable, and the results unioned together. c.f. GRAPH ?var Define SILENT to mean it applies to each invocation, so failure of one invovation does not fail the entire SERVICE ?var The determination of the possible values of the variable is the part left undefined. Don't define "Strongly bound variable" or "Service safeness" -- we are going to keep it informative and they make it too much like a formal definition after all.. Rough idea: """ A SERVICE clause involving a variable is executed as a series of separate invocations of SPARQL query services. The results of each invocation are combined using union <insert something like the defn box "Evaluation of a Service Pattern with Variable" here> The query engine must determine the possible target SPARQL query services. The exact mechanism for doing this is not defined in this document. It must be done in a way that is compatible with the rest of the query results, such as constraints on variables from other graph pattern matching in the query. Execution order may also be used to determine the list of services to to be tried. """ I don't think we can include a formal definition and argue it's left open. Andy http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0051.html
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 09:48:40 UTC