- From: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:18:37 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I would be in favor of removing SERVICE VAR. I was a bit uncomfortable with it as well. - Matt On 7/20/2011 10:14 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2011-07-20, at 03:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> So, the possible solutions are: >>> - For the SERVICE VAR semantics >>> - add a new operation that could allow the evaluation (operation >>> which wouldn't be bottom-up) >>> - define its whole semantics in a new way >>> - For the boundedness restriction >>> - specify all cases: it may take a bit long >>> - remove it? I do not think this is a good idea, how do we specify >>> then that a variable is bound (which is needed for the evaluation >>> semantics of SERVICE VAR)? >>> >>> something missing? any other option? >> As someone who was a bit uncomfortable including it in the first place, I'll add another, dramatic option: remove SERVICE VAR from the specification altogether. > That sounds like a good, pragmatic solution, but it would require a second Last Call, no? > > - Steve >
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 14:19:21 UTC