- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:59:55 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4E1EF65B.40105@epimorphics.com>
Pre LC comment:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: SPARQL Bindings Example on W3C WD
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:13:44 +0700
From: Fariz Darari
...
I am interested in SPARQL and am using it in my Semantic Web project,
especially the Federated Query feature. I have read the SPARQL Federated
Query extension specification
(http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service). I have been wondering
of the BINDINGS operative query example:
PREFIX : <http://example.org/>
PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
SELECT ?s ?o1 ?o2
{
?s ?p1 ?o1
OPTIONAL { SERVICE <http://example.org/sparql> {?s foaf:knows ?o2 }}
} BINDINGS ?o2 {
(:b)
}
Shouldn't it give the resulting sequence like below?
so1o2
<http://example.org/a>"alan@example.org
<mailto:alan@example.org>"<http://example.org/b>
<http://example.org/a>"Alan"<http://example.org/b>
<http://example.org/a>"bob@example.org
<mailto:bob@example.org>"<http://example.org/b>
<http://example.org/a>"Bob"<http://example.org/b>
<http://example.org/c>"alice@example.org
<mailto:alice@example.org>"<http://example.org/b>
<http://example.org/c>"Alice"<http://example.org/b>
I think that it's the OPTIONAL keyword that makes the result like that.
...
Best regards,
Fariz Darari
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2011 14:00:38 UTC