- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:48:03 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 12/07/11 13:16, Polleres, Axel wrote: >> Are you proposing that the format does cover ASK results? Or listing >> the changes that would be needed without advocacy? > > It seemed very little of a change, so<chair-hat off> I was in favor of covering ASK as well</chair-hat off>, but... OK. > >>> "true" or "false" followed by the end-of-line character. The following >>> sections explain how to encode the results table for a SELECT query in CSV >>> (Section 4) and TSV (Section 5). >> >> Steve and Greg have argued for requiring the header line in CSV files. >> The TSV format requires a header line. > > ... I see, the problem is that ASK wouldn't have a header line? See proposed way round this. > It seems we need a group decision on this? "this"? The editor can draft text based on input in email. Decisions are best for large or controversial issues. I was intending to change the decision so that the header line is required for CSV. >>> 6) in section 4.2 >>> >>> Why do we reference [RDF-SPARQL-QUERY] here instead of [SPARQL11-QUERY]? >> >> References are managed by the general W3C mechanisms and you can't ref >> working drafts. Has to be fixed later :-( > > Note sure whether you mean that's a process or a technical problem? (There's no problem in referenceing from one WD to another WD, right? we do that in several docs) . At least, if we mean to refer to query11 eventually, let's add a @@ not to forget? It's a ReSpec issue; Robin (as maintainer of the refs DB) does not want to put transient material into the DB. As this is a WD (and a NOTE), we can't under the same restrictions in order to publish. Publish early, publish often. As noted: "Content for inclusion in the standard biblio DB" > >> Can we please publish this as a WD-NOTE now? > > Lee said he wanted to have a look before we publish... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-07-05#line0170 > Lee? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011AprJun/0362.html Andy
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 12:48:35 UTC