- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:48:40 +0200
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 5 July 2011 10:42, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > "the D-entailment regime does guarantee anything beyond the RDFS regime." > > Should that be "does not guarantee"? Indeed :-) Changed now. Birte > Andy > > On 04/07/11 19:18, Birte Glimm wrote: >> >> I've prepared a draft response to AZ-1 >> >> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0009.html) >> at: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:AZ-1 >> >> Apart from several minor editorial changes, the Ent. Reg. doc now has >> a new (informative) Section that contains explanations that apply to >> all ent. regimes. Before this text was scattered across the doc. >> >> Cheers, >> Birte >> >> -- >> Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 >> Department of Computer Science >> University of Oxford >> Parks Road >> Oxford >> OX1 3QD >> United Kingdom >> +44 (0)1865 283520 >> > > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Department of Computer Science University of Oxford Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 08:49:16 UTC