- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:50 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, On 30 May 2011, at 23:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > The document at http://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/ is the submission that was a large part of the input to our work on SPARQL 1.1 Update. I have an action (ACTION-296) to suggest text to be added to that URI to indicate its relationship with SPARQL 1.1 Update. > > I suggest either in the abstract or status section a note that says: > > """ > Please note that this W3C Member Submission has been used as input by the [link]SPARQL Working Group in producing the [link]SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. Implementers and users are encouraged to use the SPARQL 1.1 Update document as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update. > """ > Maybe: "are encouraged" => "should" "as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update" => "as the authoritative specification for managing updates of RDF data" m2c Alex. > Please suggest any changes; otherwise, I'll ask Sandro to add this to the member submission URI in a few days. > > thanks, > Lee > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant, Social Software Unit Leader Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 09:53:22 UTC