- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:59:39 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 2011-05-30, at 12:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> Thanks for doing this - the diff is especially useful.
>
> Do we need to add the Overview document to the list of documents? if it's REC-track, then adding it for completeness would be safest.
>
> On 30/05/11 08:32, Steve Harris wrote:
>> Overall seems good to me, but I'd suggest a couple of changes:
>>
>> In light of the :s :p 18. change I'd propose to weaken the back compat requirement. Maybe something like "...excepting the case of errata", or so.
>
> Maybe add that alignment between Turtle (submission?) and SPARQL is of importance. I think this then gives us latitude to align escape processing and 18. I don't think "18." can be kept under errata as the change is being made to Turtle and SPARQL so it can't be simply classed as errata ("we really meant ...").
Yeah, I like that better.
...
> Suggestion:
> """
> The working group will consider alignment of syntax with the areas of overlay with Turtle [link-submission] where it causes minimal change.
> """
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 19:00:56 UTC