Re: UNICODE version

Ooo! Fun! We spent ages on this in the OWL WG. (XML refs too :()

I think, after much heartache, this is what we came up with:

For some discussion of the issues see:



It's worth coordinating with the RDF group on this. Ideally, esp. for things like Unicode, it'd be good to get the "auto updating" refs in, although this does sometime mean doing some extra design work (certainly did for OWL).


Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 17:30:46 UTC