- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:34:22 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
(email for process tracking) On 03/05/11 16:23, Paul Gearon wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > <snip/> > >>> more USING NAMED clauses, then the dataset will include a >>> default graph specified by the WITH clause, if present, or an empty >>> graph otherwise. >> >> To be consistent with FROM/FROM NAMED then any use of USING should be a >> complete dataset description so no USING means empty default graph >> regardless of WITH. >> >> Therefore I suggest: >> >> [[ >> If there is no USING clause, but there is >> one of more USING NAMED clauses, then the dataset will include a >> default graph which is an empty graph. >> ]] > > I agree with this change. I had an impression that WITH would be > changing the default graph in this case, which I didn't like but was > trying to preserve. I am pleased to find I was mistaken. > > Paul >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 15:34:53 UTC