- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:08:06 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 26/04/11 17:39, Steve Harris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm waiting for confirmation on the following comment responses:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1
Generally fine. We need to close ISSUE-66 before LC. Suggest removing
direct reference to the issue.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1
(minor)
Re: II
Maybe link to the explicit order.
Re: III.
"""
The group has not yet decided if BINDINGS will be usable outside of a
federated query.
"""
yes we have and yes it is :-)
A WHERE clause is necessary, this is legal:
SELECT * {} BINDINGS ?var1 ?var2 {
( "var1-value1" "var2-value1" )
( "var1-value2" "var2-value2" )
}
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-4
s/defintion/definition/
s/sancions/sanctions/
and I agree, in fact there is no concept of precision in XSD decimals
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#decimal
There is a minimum number of 18 decimal digits.
Andy
>
> Corresponding to ACTION-322, ACTION-340, and ACTION-401.
>
> - Steve
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 18:08:34 UTC