Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

On 2010-12-23, at 11:58, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> 
>> I had an action to look at including CONSTRUCT WHERE { ... } for commonality with DELETE WHERE. I've not done anything about that, but it looks to me like it could be included as:
>> 
>> 'CONSTRUCT WHERE' GroupGraphPattern SolutionModifier
> 
> See discussion:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0462.html

I completely forgot that.

In that case, modulo the stuff I've already mentioned, I think it's OK.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 12:10:09 UTC