Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is from Andy Seaborne on 2010-12-23 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2010)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:29:53 +0000
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D1324A1.4060800@epimorphics.com>

Greg pointed out that META has sneaked into the grammar in rq25.  Please 
ignore it.

 Andy

On 21/12/10 13:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> As one step towards Last Call, can we agree that the grammar is complete
> as is? i.e., we do not intend to change any elements of the grammar
> beyond decisions that have already been made, whether it by syntax,
> keywords, functions, or anything else.
>
> If you think there is still any outstanding issues that impact on the
> grammar, please speak up ASAP -- otherwise we'll conclude that it the
> grammar is complete in a couple of days.
>
> thanks,
> Lee
>

Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 10:30:29 UTC