Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

Greg pointed out that META has sneaked into the grammar in rq25.  Please 
ignore it.


On 21/12/10 13:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> As one step towards Last Call, can we agree that the grammar is complete
> as is? i.e., we do not intend to change any elements of the grammar
> beyond decisions that have already been made, whether it by syntax,
> keywords, functions, or anything else.
> If you think there is still any outstanding issues that impact on the
> grammar, please speak up ASAP -- otherwise we'll conclude that it the
> grammar is complete in a couple of days.
> thanks,
> Lee

Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 10:30:29 UTC