- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:51:52 -0500
- To: "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 12/6/10 9:23 AM, "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > We've been using this feature for a number of years, and only allow absolute > URIs here. There are a number of difficulties if you allow relative URIs, such > as relative to what? The client can end up with different expectations to the > server, even without xml:base muddying the waters. After discussion on IRC following today's teleconference, there were additional usecases that made this problem more evident and it was not clear who to ask to verify these examples as well as clarification on URI resolution. So, I will make the relevant changes to the editor's draft. -- Chime =================================== P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 17:00:35 UTC