Re: new version of fed query

First of all, I've not yet read this document, but I have a comment and Andy's notes...

On 2010-12-20, at 16:10, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Doc length: While we have said that we'd incorporate this into the main query document, I'm now owdoenrign if this is a good idea.  The content of the doc is 9 pages of content.   That's a lot to put in rq25 and big enough to be it's own document.  Suggestion: keep it in the main grammar, have a reference from the query document to federated query in the intro and note in the grammar section it includes the grammar rules needed.

Agreed. rq25 is already quite big, and another 9 pages will make it quite imposing for potential implementors.

> (To be a bit contrary to the above point):
> BINDINGS: Should we separate this from SERVICE because it's used in the (non-SERVICE) query sent to the remote endpoint.

I think it makes sense to do that.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Monday, 20 December 2010 16:37:15 UTC