- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:14:37 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 14/12/10 16:22, Andy Seaborne wrote: > This message is collect any issues and comments on the DAWG Note: > > "Serializing SPARQL Query Results in JSON" > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/ > > Please reply to this message with any issues on this Note within one > week so we can assess the practical implications of taking this through > to REC as part of this working group. > > Andy > > (This completes ACTION-349) I have taken the HTML from the WG Note and created working copy in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/rdf-sparql-json-res.html This is the content of the the NOTE except it says "Editor's working draft". Sandro, chairs, Process question: is it normal practice to have at least one WG Working Draft before Last call or should we take this straight to Last Call, givben it's been a WG-Note. Andy
Received on Sunday, 19 December 2010 17:15:15 UTC