- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:01:20 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, could we have feedback on Chime's mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0352.html regrading his proposals on how to proceed with HTTP-update-ISSUEs, collected at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/HTTP-UPDATE-ISSUES and Andy's follow-up asking for URI resolution http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0354.html Ideally, if the OWL entailment regimes discussion doesn't take too much time, it would be nice if we could discuss these and close related issues (e.g. ISSUE-56) before Christmas, or at latest forst TC after christmas. Opinions solicited! Axel
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 17:01:55 UTC