- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:11:25 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 13/12/10 22:47, Axel Polleres wrote: > ACTION-306: Lee to Work with Axel to identify potential editor(s) to shepherd > through JSON document on Rec track > * if we want JSON result format then this critical for LC* > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/ anybody willing to pick this > up, otherwise I am afraid we need to let it go, NickH and several > others were quite keen on it. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-07#JSON_Results_Format > but we didn't get any volunteers in response. In view of the recent RDF charter, I think is has become quite important. Are there any issues with it? If no one else is able to, I volunteer to edit it (where "edit" to me means "coordinate" and "reformat for LC and beyond"). There is a JSON schema language: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zyp-json-schema-03 Does someone what to take a pass at writing the schema for SPARQL Query Results in JSON? > ACTION-331: Andy to Clarify the meaning of "potentially bound" vis a vis what > can go on the right hand side of an AS in a SELECT list > *critical for last call* Noted. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 10:12:03 UTC