- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:56:21 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
[snip] > Since we're hearing a pretty strong mixed opinion from the OWL implementers > on this list, are there other implementers that we can talk to to ask which > of these two approaches they'd prefer? I talked to a couple of people at ISWC and also before at the DL workshop or when I visited other universities. Enrico is the only person I have talked to who is stongly against the current spec. Several people are for the way the current spec is defined and some seem to have no strong preference or a slight preference for one or the other. I assume we could organise a teleconf on this topic and invite OWL folks via the OWL mailing list to participate, but also the public working drafts are announced on the list and so far nobody saw the need to comment on this. Anyway, I am happy to do whatever can help to move forward with the spec. Birte > thanks, > Lee > > > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2010 13:56:49 UTC