- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:12:44 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Observation, not proposal: BIND (expr1 AS ?x, expr2 AS ?y) would work BIND (expr1 AS ?x) is more like the use in SELECT to me - each named expression value is enclosed in (). Or change SELECT as well. I don't see this as important. Andy On 17/11/10 14:54, Axel Polleres wrote: > alright, changed response draft respectively... > check http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1 > > Axel > > > On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:49, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> >> >> On 17/11/10 11:35, Steve Harris wrote: >>> On 2010-11-17, at 11:28, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote: >>>> >>>>> Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()? >>>> >>>> not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy? >>>> (I have no strong feelings on either) >>> >>> BIND() BIND() might leave more syntax options open in the future, but no strong preference. >> >> BIND is exactly: >> >> BIND(expr AS ?var) >> >> A trailing optional expression will have lookahead problems with RDF >> list which also starts "(" >> >> Andy >> >>> >>> - Steve >>> >>>>> It's probably right, just checking the response is correct. >>>>> >>>>> - Steve >>>>> >>>>> On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I put up a draft response for >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html >>>>>> >>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft. >>>>>> >>>>>> Axel >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited >>>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK >>>>> +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ >>>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 >>>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 15:13:22 UTC