- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:49:52 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 17/11/10 11:35, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 2010-11-17, at 11:28, Axel Polleres wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote:
>>
>>> Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()?
>>
>> not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy?
>> (I have no strong feelings on either)
>
> BIND() BIND() might leave more syntax options open in the future, but no strong preference.
BIND is exactly:
BIND(expr AS ?var)
A trailing optional expression will have lookahead problems with RDF
list which also starts "("
Andy
>
> - Steve
>
>>> It's probably right, just checking the response is correct.
>>>
>>> - Steve
>>>
>>> On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote:
>>>
>>>> I put up a draft response for
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html
>>>>
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
>>>>
>>>> Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft.
>>>>
>>>> Axel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>>> +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 14:50:31 UTC