- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 02:18:52 +0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1) As a *very minor* editorial issue, I think we should follow a uniform capitalisation of function names in the doc, cf.
16.4.22 STRDT
vs.
16.4.6 str
or is their a rationale behind different capitalisation here that I overlooked?
2) another minor comment, there are URIs for
STRLANG
--> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/#plfn:PlainLiteral-from-string-lang
LANG
--> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/#plfn:lang-from-PlainLiteral
which we may want to reuse, or should we uniformly refer to the
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql-functions#
for all functions (also the xs: ones?
Axel
On 4 Nov 2010, at 01:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 03/11/10 17:25, Paul Gearon wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org> wrote:
>> <snip/>
>>> Math/Logic
>>> Many of these are already covered, but I'd like to see:
>>> if(cond, true-expr, false-expr)
>>> I believe this is already possible, but an if() function makes certain
>>> tasks much easier.
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot that IF has been included in the builtins already.
>> It's not documented yet, but I presume that it operates as I remember:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20100601/#func-if
>>
>> So please ignore that part of my earlier email.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>
> Wrong version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/
>
> See
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-if
>
> We should charge for saying "it's not done yet" - pay in HTML content to include.
>
> Andy
>
>
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 18:19:30 UTC