Re: Updated delete tests

Hi Greg,

Yes. We should definitely add some more tests for this. I'll try to put 
a few of these in.

- Matt

Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Matt Perry wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Looks like I misunderstood some things. I'll revise the tests to get them in line with the spec.
>>     
>
> Matt,
>
> Regarding the tests you changed (e.g. dawg-delete-01), it seems that you've gotten rid of all the tests that demonstrated the misunderstanding here. I think we should continue to have tests like that (where the DELETE pattern has variables that don't get bound), but with expected results that show that the DELETE operation doesn't end up removing triples based on patterns with unbound variables.
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
>