- From: Matt Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:46:34 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Andy,
Looks like I misunderstood some things. I'll revise the tests to get
them in line with the spec.
Thanks,
Matt
Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/10 19:04, Matt Perry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have updated the tests in the delete, delete-data and delete-where
>> directories to use the new ut vocabulary.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>
> Matt,
>
> I can parse the manifests successfully. The tests themselves caused
> some issues:
>
> ==== delete/
> Tests = 12 : Successes = 4 : Errors = 0 : Failures = 8
>
> For example:
> == Test :dawg-delete-01
>
> == delete-01.ru
> PREFIX : <http://example.org/>
> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
>
> DELETE
> {
> ?s ?p ?o .
> }
> WHERE
> {
> :a foaf:knows ?s .
> }
> so regardless of the data, ?p and ?o do not get bound and no triples
> will be deleted.
>
> Was the assumption that variables in DELETE template act as wildcards?
>
> Example 1, of section "3.1.4 DELETE", places variables in the WHERE
> clause to get them bound for the template.
>
>
>
> ==== delete-data/
> Tests = 6 : Successes = 6 : Errors = 0 : Failures = 0
>
> ==== delete-where/
> Tests = 6 : Successes = 3 : Errors = 3 : Failures = 0
>
> 3 tests involve DELETE DATA, not DELETE WHERE:
> delete-where-02.ru
> delete-where-05.ru
> delete-where-06.ru
>
>
> Andy
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 13:47:28 UTC