- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:18:38 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 2010-10-14, at 13:33, Axel Polleres wrote: > As for aggregates (mentioned by Andy), > > SELECT * (agg(Expr) AS ?var) > > could indeed make sense, taken that * implicitly projects all grouped variables > (following the definition of "potentially bound") My recollection is that we had a strawpoll and the majority were in favour of retaining the meaning of * from SPARQL 1.0. Could be wrong though. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 13:19:17 UTC