- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:13:52 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
looking over the minutes from last time and trying to understand the conclusion of the BINDINGS discussion...
Do I miss anything or is semantically just the same as a Subquery:
i.e.
WHERE { P ]
BINDINGS ?X1 ... ?Xn { ( c11 ... c1n ) (c21 ... c2n) ... }
just boils down to
WHERE { { P }
{ {SELECT ( c11 AS ?X2 ) ... ( c1n AS ?Xn ) WHERE {} }
UNION
{SELECT ( c21 AS ?X2 ) ... ( c2n AS ?Xn ) WHERE {} }
UNION
...
} }
correct?
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 19:20:27 UTC