Paul Gearon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Axel Polleres<axel.polleres@deri.org> > wrote: > > just to pick up the discussion on "option 6" in today's telecon which was > > mentioned in a rush in the end of the telecon... > > > > I didn't get clear how > > > > DESCRIBE ENDPOINT > > or > > SELFDESCRIBE > > > > are different from > > > > DESCRIBE <endpoint-URI> > > > > Can someone elaborate? > > A service may not necessarily know it's own endpoint URI so the latter > may not be possible. That's also why Steve raised the issue of > relative URIs. So that could be DESCRIBE <.> then? > On a slightly separate note, the "DESCRIBE <endpoint-URI>" form may be > capable of referring to descriptions on other endpoints. May that's > something we want to consider (or to exclude). yeah, that makes it look appealing somehow. Axel > Regards, > Paul > -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:24:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:55 UTC