- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:34:10 +0100
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > All, > > I've tried to faithfully distill examples of ProjectExpressions from the > discussion we had (thanks for contributing!), and put it in the wiki: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ProjectExpressions#Example > > I decided to keep fn:concat(), since it was a pretty useful example of > something one may want to do and indeed, the arguments against it > weren't very strong. I put a reference to Xpath F&O in our F&R, and I > use that reference in the wiki. > > Then, I put in only one example of a CONSTRUCT, the one with a subquery. > While I felt this is a bit too complex for the examples of this > document, it seems to me that it is also quite clear how it should be > done. As opposed to a CONSTRUCT where the function is in the > ConstructTemplate, which is very useful and interesting, but it seems to > require more discussion, especially to make it stand apart from the list > shorthand syntax. I put a reference to the subquery section along with it. > > I think what is now in the wiki is acceptable, but I have not yet > committed it to the document. I'd like to encourage those who are > interested to make edits to it, and I'll commit what is there just > before the teleconf. I re-entered the CONSTRUCT template version, though I felt bad with it being removed without discussion. Instead, I added a TODO reflecting the issue and linking to Andy's mail, cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/index.php?title=Feature%3AProjectExpressions&diff=912&oldid=906 Also cleaned up the PREFIXes and aligned the use of foaf:surname foaf:givenname among the SELECT and CONSTRUCT example. Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 13:34:49 UTC