Re: Features & rationale shortname

Axel wrote:
> but where there is no prior document, I guess we wouldn't need that.

Right, there is no previous version, but there may well be a successor, and I'd like to prepare for that. It feels awkward that we need to talk about the previous SPARQL by a new name, i.e. SPARQL/Query 1.0, and so I'd like to define a version so that the next WG doesn't need to.


Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 09:22:57 UTC