- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:57:06 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 8 May 2009, at 17:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Bijan Parsia wrote: >> On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- >>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum >>>> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41 >>>> To: SPARQL Working Group >>>> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets >>>> >>>> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What >>>> do you >>>> think?) >>> >>> A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the >>> tag in the form ISSUE-number. >> The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that >> tracker keeps track of them: >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8 >> I found this very handy in the OWL WG. > > whoa, awesome. > > does it handle any other syntax or did i just semi-accidentally > stumble on the right way of doing it? http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email Ya got lucky, punk :) (Short answer: It doesn't have to be in the subject, the word ISSUE or ACTION has to be capitalized, and the form is (ISSUE|ACTION)-[0-9]+ Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:57:43 UTC