- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:46:54 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum >> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41 >> To: SPARQL Working Group >> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets >> >> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What do >> you >> think?) > > A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the tag > in the form ISSUE-number. The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that tracker keeps track of them: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8 I found this very handy in the OWL WG. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:47:32 UTC