RE: rdf:text review

You removed the text suggesting a SPARQL section - I think it would be very helpful to have the SPARQL material in one place in the rdf:text document. This will include helpful to SPARQL implementers and SPARQL-related review.

	Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Axel Polleres [mailto:axel.polleres@deri.org]
> Sent: 06 May 2009 17:31
> To: Seaborne, Andy
> Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group'
> Subject: Re: rdf:text review
> 
> I reworded slightly, as I don't want to require to add an own section
> to
> the spec. I will clarify this during the discussion:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/index.php?title=Rdf_text_LC_WG_comme
> nt&diff=740&oldid=723
> 
> Axel
> 
> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Axel Polleres [mailto:axel.polleres@deri.org]
> >> Sent: 29 April 2009 15:39
> >> To: Axel Polleres; Seaborne, Andy
> >> Cc: Bijan Parsia; 'RDF Data Access Working Group'
> >> Subject: Re: rdf:text review
> >>
> >> I put the draft comment on the wiki:
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Rdf_text_LC_WG_comment
> >>
> >
> > I've reworked it to be more suitable as reply. Added:
> >
> > 1. Point out the RDF invariant of literals having lang tag or
> datatype but not both.
> >
> > 2. How literals are passed back out of an extension entailment
> regimes affects the literal accessors of LANG/DATATYPE/STR
> >
> > 3. A question about effective boolean values of rdf:text literals.
> >
> > 	Andy
> 
> 
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
> Galway
> email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 16:49:38 UTC