- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:18:43 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Axel Polleres [mailto:axel.polleres@deri.org] > Sent: 29 April 2009 15:39 > To: Axel Polleres; Seaborne, Andy > Cc: Bijan Parsia; 'RDF Data Access Working Group' > Subject: Re: rdf:text review > > I put the draft comment on the wiki: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Rdf_text_LC_WG_comment > I've reworked it to be more suitable as reply. Added: 1. Point out the RDF invariant of literals having lang tag or datatype but not both. 2. How literals are passed back out of an extension entailment regimes affects the literal accessors of LANG/DATATYPE/STR 3. A question about effective boolean values of rdf:text literals. Andy
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2009 13:25:14 UTC