- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:57:15 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > There are a few things that I'm surprised aren't higher, eg SPARQL/OWL, but > currently I think those things are more candidates for a WG Note, than Rec. > track. I also think that's representative of the way respondents have voted. Recent birth of a child has prevented me from WBS'ing, and I haven't even had time to look at results, but we'll go through the WBS later today and maybe that will shift something around. :> . Cheers, Kendall PS--I never sent my intro: I'm Kendall Clark, was involved with some earlier SPARQL work in DAWG, and we do OWL infrastructure products & services now, mostly around Pellet and related stuff.
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 16:58:09 UTC