W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: picking our features

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:57:15 -0400
Message-ID: <1fc9c2ff0904290957t7cf24bb9u908babd5ddb47477@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> There are a few things that I'm surprised aren't higher, eg SPARQL/OWL, but
> currently I think those things are more candidates for a WG Note, than Rec.
> track. I also think that's representative of the way respondents have voted.

Recent birth of a child has prevented me from WBS'ing, and I haven't
even had time to look at results, but we'll go through the WBS later
today and maybe that will shift something around. :>

PS--I never sent my intro: I'm Kendall Clark, was involved with some
earlier SPARQL work in DAWG, and we do OWL infrastructure products &
services now, mostly around Pellet and related stuff.
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 16:58:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:54 UTC