- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:07:07 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6C85B277-5F85-4CE5-8FF9-D6571AF97437@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
I did a very quick sketch[1] of an XML syntax for the algebra. It doesn't yet contain filters and is *really* preliminary. But I thought I'd send it. I hope to have time to work on it next week. Some adjustments to the grammar and terminology would make it easier to align this directly with the spec (a la the way OWL/XML aligns with the structural specification). I intend one for the surface syntax as well. I probably can't make todays telecon. I'll try to arrange my teaching next week to be there, but it may not be possible. There is one more class after next week then I'm considerably freer on Tues. ;) I'd be surprised if it were a full person week to define a tight schema for the language, algebra, and mapping to the more human oriented syntaxes as well as the compilation from the language to the algebra. I like supporting both for all the reasons I've said before: 1) Use the XML toolchain for writing and manipulating queries 2) Removes a barrier for some users for whom if it's not XML it ain't getting in (I have such users, fwiw) 3) Supports a commonly understandable abstract model as well as a slight less abstract model but still above the concrete syntax Cheers, Bijan. [1] Really. I spent like an hour in a coffee shop on it :)
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: sparqal.xsd
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 09:16:25 UTC