- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:51:31 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Friday 17 April 2009 23:47:15 Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > xml literal results 1 / 5 / 6 straw poll Come to think of it, I find the current way of doing this aesthetically displeasing. Also, you can't address the data in the XML Literal with e.g. XPath, can you? In that case, it is something that I would find pragmatically more important than XML Schema validation. However, I have had no practical need for it so far, and I'm not ready to devote any time to it. But perhaps we should let the original submitter have a chance to argue for it a little further? Kind regards Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Senior Knowledge Engineer Mobile: +47 986 48 234 Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com Web: http://www.computas.com/ | SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE | Computas AS PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 1001
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 10:52:21 UTC