- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:36:24 -0400
- To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 18 September 2007 at 14:30:00 UTC + LeeF chairing + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333 + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + Scribe: @@ + Regrets: Chimezie + roll call + minutes from last week [2] + next meeting 25 Sep. @@ recruit scribe, regrets? + agenda comments? 1. Review ACTION Items These actions appear DONE: ACTION: ericP to have first cut of shiny implementation report by 11 Sep ACTION: Orri and Ivan to publish URL to test service along with a list of tests that aren't handled correctly yet ACTION: AndyS to try SOAP protocol tests against Joseki and Virtuoso endpoints ACTION: LeeF to update open-world manifest with mf:requires for open-eq-12 ACTION: LeeF to update Turtle data to have explicit lexical forms and answer Gregory W's mail Let's check on the status of the following actions: -- misc -- ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings is not defined here ACTION: ericP to answer "EBV of invalid numeric literals" email from Arjohn ACTION: LeeF to put together CR transition request for SPARQL XML format and EricP to publish -- implementation report -- -- tests -- ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in documentation [progress, see below] ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest namespace document -- spec -- ACTION: ericP to incorporate text to fix EBV of illformed numeric literals bug in spec ACTION: ericP to try to produce a diff from CR to current editor's draft 2. SPARQL Query Results XML Format Publication status? 3. Protocol testing Update: + SOAP version incompatibilities - next step? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0149.html + HTTP testing (update from Elias, probably via Lee as proxy) 4. mf:requires Andy did some work to catalog the mf:requires labels. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0147.html Andy brings up a few questions/issues that we should briefly discuss to clean up the mf:requires stuff. 5. Implementation Report EricP put together a first version of the HTML for an implementation report: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0150.html which references: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/implementations Things we should cover on the telecon include: + What's the process of generating/regenerating the implementation report? + What does it mean for an implementations to support a feature ("green box")? + Do we need to include all implementation results received, or should we highlight only those that fulfill our CR exit criteria? + When can we expect other results? 6. Towards PR Let's add a standing agendum to look at our exit criteria to move from CR to PR so that we can plan ahead. I'm aiming for Sept. 25 for the moment for discussing a decision to transition to PR. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0134/2007-09-11-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 14:36:40 UTC