- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:36:24 -0400
- To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 18 September 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
+ LeeF chairing
+ teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200
tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
+ on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
+ Scribe: @@
+ Regrets: Chimezie
+ roll call
+ minutes from last week [2]
+ next meeting 25 Sep. @@ recruit scribe, regrets?
+ agenda comments?
1. Review ACTION Items
These actions appear DONE:
ACTION: ericP to have first cut of shiny implementation report by 11 Sep
ACTION: Orri and Ivan to publish URL to test service along with a list
of tests that aren't handled correctly yet
ACTION: AndyS to try SOAP protocol tests against Joseki and Virtuoso
endpoints
ACTION: LeeF to update open-world manifest with mf:requires for open-eq-12
ACTION: LeeF to update Turtle data to have explicit lexical forms and
answer Gregory W's mail
Let's check on the status of the following actions:
-- misc --
ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types
(esp. application/sparql-query)
ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter
and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings
is not defined here
ACTION: ericP to answer "EBV of invalid numeric literals" email from Arjohn
ACTION: LeeF to put together CR transition request for SPARQL XML format
and EricP to publish
-- implementation report --
-- tests --
ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in
documentation
[progress, see below]
ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest
namespace document
-- spec --
ACTION: ericP to incorporate text to fix EBV of illformed numeric
literals bug in spec
ACTION: ericP to try to produce a diff from CR to current editor's draft
2. SPARQL Query Results XML Format
Publication status?
3. Protocol testing
Update:
+ SOAP version incompatibilities - next step? See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0149.html
+ HTTP testing (update from Elias, probably via Lee as proxy)
4. mf:requires
Andy did some work to catalog the mf:requires labels. See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0147.html
Andy brings up a few questions/issues that we should briefly discuss to
clean up the mf:requires stuff.
5. Implementation Report
EricP put together a first version of the HTML for an implementation report:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0150.html
which references:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/implementations
Things we should cover on the telecon include:
+ What's the process of generating/regenerating the implementation report?
+ What does it mean for an implementations to support a feature ("green
box")?
+ Do we need to include all implementation results received, or should
we highlight only those that fulfill our CR exit criteria?
+ When can we expect other results?
6. Towards PR
Let's add a standing agendum to look at our exit criteria to move from
CR to PR so that we can plan ahead. I'm aiming for Sept. 25 for the
moment for discussing a decision to transition to PR.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0134/2007-09-11-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 14:36:40 UTC