Re: GRDDL transformation for SPARQL Query Results XML Format?

On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:33 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:11 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> wrote:
> > [Cross posted.  Followup to public-grddl-wg@w3.org please.]
> > 
> > Regarding
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/
> > 
> > Is there a GRDDL transformation planned?
> I wouldn't expect one. What would it produce?

Luckily, I have proofs and such currently swapped in my brain, so here
is a suggestion (perhaps random): Why not generate variable bindings
expressed in a proof format (either reason.n3 [1] or PML [2])?  Both
have terms for capturing variable bindings..

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2000/10/swap/reason.n3
[2] http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl

-- 
Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org


===================================

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S. News & World Report (2007).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 19:40:10 UTC