- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:37:39 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> 2. Test suite > > We're ready to approve the remaining tests and publish and advertise the > test > suite. Please see this email for details on the remaining tests and > contribute > implementation results when you can: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0089.html ARQ passes all the tests under manifest-evaluation.ttl, both normal and reference query engine (so includes runing with no optimizer "helping" for the new combo and complex tests :-)) The i18n/ and dataset/ directories, which are marked approved, weren't in manifest-evaluation so I added them and committed manifest-evaluation.ttl. They are already using the URIs. I make it 237 tests in 23 sets. EARL results: http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/DAWG/ > 5. Test license > > See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Aug/0016.html > > . I'm guessing our tests are licensed under the W3C License: > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 I'm happy with this license. We need to ensure point 1 (display of the notice) is handled. W3C would be the copyright holder as the tests were developed by the working group? Andy > > ...but we should clarify this. -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 17:37:58 UTC