- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:55:31 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 26 Jul 2007, at 13:21, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Steve Harris wrote: >> On 25 Jul 2007, at 21:35, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> Seaborne, Andy wrote: >>>> Some tests for LIMIT/OFFSET >>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/solution-seq/ >>>> All the test involve ORDER BY so that the results are consistent. >>> Glitter passes all but slice-4 and slice-5. Upon further >>> inspection, these tests (maybe others?) > > There are no others. > >>> rely on sorting xsd:integer typed literals and plain literals in >>> a consistent manner, which I think we agreed is undefined by the >>> spec? >> I fail slice-4 & 5 for the same reason. > > Fixed in CVS. Excellent, I can now pass all of them. I actually don't without some sed action, but that's a known parser deficiency, the tests get my thumbs up. > By the way - these are draft tests - you can fix them up. I wasn't sure they were wrong. I have the impression that I've implemented < as per the spec, but one can never be sure. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 14:55:21 UTC