- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:21:27 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Steve Harris wrote: > > On 25 Jul 2007, at 21:35, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > >> Seaborne, Andy wrote: >>> Some tests for LIMIT/OFFSET >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/solution-seq/ >>> All the test involve ORDER BY so that the results are consistent. >> Glitter passes all but slice-4 and slice-5. Upon further >> inspection, these tests (maybe others?) There are no others. >> rely on sorting xsd:integer >> typed literals and plain literals in a consistent manner, which I >> think we agreed is undefined by the spec? > > I fail slice-4 & 5 for the same reason. Fixed in CVS. By the way - these are draft tests - you can fix them up. Andy > > I pass the I18N tests. > > - Steve > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 12:21:36 UTC