- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:52:15 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > As per my action, I've wrapped a bit of explanatory text around Chime's > example EARL results and put them up in our Web space at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/earl > > Comments welcome, as this is a rough first version. Still, combined with > the overview page, I think we've got most of what we need in place to > begin asking implementations to contribute test results. > > Lee > It looks good. To show I've read it ... s/2004/2007/ in the copyright :-) [[ The RDF Data Access Working Group (DAWG) uses a test-driven process. The test area is a collection of collection of the current and superseded test cases of the working group. ]] Minor: if the page is a letter to implementers as the next 2 paras suggests, this text is unnecessary. Also, as it points to the new area, there are no superseded tests. In the example report, it uses the "[ :p "foo" ] ." syntax form which isn't strict Turtle. The namespace prefix "_8:" isn't legal SPARQL (starts with _ but is not a blank node) but is legal Turtle. Some reports may be written directly by text-generating script; some will be generated by serializing a graph as in the example, I guess. We are making a statement about what we will accept by giving an example. If we are prepared to accept this form, then no need to change the example. I don't think we are in the business of enforcing other specs so I'm happy with the example as is. Andy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 13:52:25 UTC