W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Agenda - 24 Jul 2007 @ 14:30 UTC - Eric P chairing

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:01:01 -0400
Message-ID: <46A4D0BD.2020506@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Hi everyone,

I've got an unavoidable conflict tomorrow so I have to give my regrets 
for the meeting. Eric P has agreed to chair in my place, so the show 
will go on.

Some progress this week with a new test overview page and an initial 
document on submitting EARL results should get us closer to soliciting 
implementation test results.

I'll be around on IRC most of the week and will be back as usual next week.


0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 24 July 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
          + ericP chairing
          + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
          + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
          + Scribe: AndyS
          + Regrets: LeeF
          + roll call
          + any minutes to approve?
          + next meeting 31 Jul. @@ recruit scribe
          + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: LeeF to generate overview page of data-r2 tests
ACTION: LeeF to put up a document with sample EARL results and call out 
important points (e.g. foaf:homepage URI and/or URIs for implementations

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

-- misc --

ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types 
(esp. application/sparql-query)
ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter 
and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings 
is not defined here

-- implementation report --

ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing 
tests to summarize coverage
ACTION: ericP & chimezie to see if all the identified algebraic forms 
fit into the XPath-based facet approach
ACTION: ericP to requisition /TR/SPARQL as a switcher document pointing 
to the real specs
ACTION: EliasT to come up with feature list for protocol testing

-- tests --

ACTION: ericP to write a test showing that langMatches doens't do 
extended matching
ACTION: LeeF to mark 10 distinct tests in 
  as approved
ACTION: LeeF to mark type promotion tests approved 
ACTION: AndyS or LeeF to mark non-SELECT tests using :QueryForm classes, 
and to move those URIs to the qt: namespace
ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in 
ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest 
namespace document

2. Test overview page



3. EARL overview page



4. Soliciting implementation reports

For time considerations, I'd like to begin asking implementors to be in 
a position (if they are able/willing) to run the DAWG test suite even 
before we've finalized the test suite. Given where we are now, what else 
(if anything) needs to be in place before we reach out to implementors?

5. Test progress

Any new tests to look at?

6. Test features

Any progress on mapping algebraic forms to XPath features?

Any progress on classifying the tests to determine our coverage?

7. Test harness?

Ivan M. has indicated (offline) that he does plan to supply the 
automated test-suite-running service that we had discussed a month or 
two back.

I'd like to get an update on that work, so that we can include this 
information when we reach out to implementations and find out which (if 
any?) implementations will/would make use of this service.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
Received on Monday, 23 July 2007 16:01:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:51 UTC