- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:49:52 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote on 01/08/2007 02:10:40 PM: > >> The attached comment is new information on >> issues#accessingCollections . >> >> It seems to me that the algebraic approach to specifying SPARQL >> might making this sort of thing fairly straightforward; i.e. >> the situation looks different to me than it did in Feb 2005 >> when we resolved to postpone. >> >> Does anybody else think it's worth taking another look at this now? > > It's on this week's agenda, so we'll at least get a feel for how > people > feel about the costs and benefits of taking up accessingCollections > as a > new feature at this point. Lee, I have to send regrets for tomorrow's meeting; I trust you will consider my strong "no" vote to reopening accessingCollections? Thanks. Cheers, Kendall
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 19:50:14 UTC